Urinary Protein And Peptide Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease Part 1

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a non-specific type of kidney disease that causes a gradual decline in kidney function (from months to years). CKD is a significant risk factor for death, cardiovascular disease, and end-stage renal disease. CKDs of different origins may have the same clinical and laboratory manifestations but different progression rates, which requires early diagnosis to determine. This review focuses on protein/peptide biomarkers of the leading causes of CKD: diabetic nephropathy, IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and membranous nephropathy. Mass spectrometry (MS) approaches provided the most information about urinary peptides and protein contents in different nephropathies. New analytical approaches allow urinary proteomic–peptide profiles to be used as early non-invasive diagnostic tools for specific morphological forms of kidney disease and may become a safe alternative to renal biopsy. MS studies of the key pathogenetic mechanisms of renal disease progression may also contribute to developing new approaches for targeted therapy.

Keywords

biomarkers; urine; proteomics; chronic kidney disease

1. Introduction 

According to The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as an abnormality in kidney structure or function present for more than 3 months, with health implications [1,2]. CKD is an independent risk factor for death, cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, and acute kidney injury [3–7] and has a global prevalence of 11–13% [8]. CKD is a socially significant problem due to the high risk of early disability from the disease and the need for high-cost treatments in the case of end-stage renal failures, such as hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplants [9,10]. The three most common causes of CKD are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and glomerulonephritis, especially with nephrotic syndrome [11]. Kidney diseases can have similar clinical symptoms and may range from mild and benign to progressive with rapid end-stage renal disease development. The severity of the clinical manifestations, however, does not always correspond to the severity of renal damage, which can be determined by renal biopsy [12]. The majority of patients undergo a single kidney biopsy to determine the morphological form of kidney disease. In sporadic cases, the biopsy is repeated to assess the effectiveness of therapy and prognosis. However, the assessment of the regression of nephropathic activity is crucial for the dynamic assessment of treatment, including the treatment’s effectiveness, optimization, and prognosis. 

According to relevant studies, cistanche is a traditional Chinese herb that has been used for centuries to treat various diseases. It has been scientifically proven to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, and antioxidant properties. Studies have shown that Cistanche is beneficial for patients suffering from kidney disease. The active ingredients of Cistanche are known to reduce inflammation, improve kidney function and restore impaired kidney cells. Thus, integrating Cistanche within a kidney disease treatment plan can offer great benefits to patients in managing their condition.

Click On Cistanche Tubulosa For Kidney Disease

Ask for more: 

david.deng@wecistanche.com  WhatApp:86 13632399501

Cistanche helps to reduce proteinuria, lowers BUN and creatinine levels, and decreases the risk of further kidney damage. In addition, cistanche also helps reduce cholesterol and triglyceride levels which can be dangerous to patients suffering from kidney disease.

Cistanche's antioxidant and anti-aging properties help to protect the kidneys from oxidation and damage caused by free radicals. This improves kidney health and reduces the risks of developing complications. Cistanche also helps to boost the immune system, which is essential in fighting off kidney infections and promoting kidney health.

By combining traditional Chinese herbal medicine and modern western medicine, those suffering from kidney disease can have a more comprehensive approach to treating the condition and improving their quality of life. Cistanche should be used as part of a treatment plan but is not to be used as an alternative to conventional medical treatments.

Urine proteomic analysis is a much safer option compared to a biopsy and has good potential for developing non-invasive diagnostic methods. Urine analysis has several advantages compared to blood proteomic analysis [13]. Firstly, the urine proteome is not very complicated and mainly contains proteins and peptides of renal origin (up to 70%). On the contrary, kidney damage markers comprise only a small fraction of the highly diverse plasma/serum proteome, making their analysis in the latter challenging. Secondly, it is much easier to normalize the concentration of a protein biomarker in the urine than in the blood—for example, based on the concentration of creatinine [14]. Thirdly, urine collection is simple and non-invasive. Finally, urine samples are stable at a temperature of −20 ◦C and are suitable for proteomic analysis even after years of storage [15]. The aforementioned advantages of urine make it a popular subject for the search for protein markers for various pathologies [16]. These pathologies include renal and genitourinary pathologies and pathologies associated with proteinuria, such as kidney diseases [17–19]; bladder, prostate, and ovarian cancers [20–23]; diabetic nephropathy [24]; and pre-eclampsia [25–27]. Urinary protein markers have also been described for colon and lung cancers [28,29], cholangiocarcinoma [30], cardiovascular diseases [31], autoimmune diseases [32], and infectious diseases [33]. Nevertheless, the urine proteome should be most informative for renal pathologies and may present a fingerprint of different kidney diseases [34–39] (Table 1).

However, despite a large number of studies, there are still no reliable kidney-disease-specific biomarkers that can be accurately reproduced in different studies. The various factors affecting proteome composition include the collection conditions and regime (morning, daily, variability over several days, etc.), physical activity, nutrition, the anatomical features of the urinary tract (the absence of one kidney, etc.), sex, and age [40–43]. All of these factors should be taken into account when comparing the results of different studies. In general, combining the markers of specific nephropathies outlined in various studies could facilitate better progress in the creation of highly specific differentiating panels for possible clinical use after multi-stage prospective validation [44]. 

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches, which feature a high multiplexing capacity, are the most unbiased and sensitive instruments and have already provided most of the currently known information about urine peptide and protein contents in different nephropathies, as well as potential biomarker panels for various diseases [37–39]. A number of MS methods have been successfully applied (Table 1). The most commonly used approaches include matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flflight (MALDI-TOF), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and liquid chromatography (LC) MS. The most advanced approaches with isobaric or tandem mass tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ and TMT) facilitate the identifification of markers among commonly present proteins and peptides when their amounts vary signifificantly. In general, the listed untargeted MS approaches are the most appropriate for the primary search of potential biomarkers, whereas targeted MS and immunoassays can be used for further validation.

This review summarizes data from numerous studies of the urine proteome in nephropathies associated with CKD, with a focus on recent studies from 2015 to 2021. The electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane were searched using keywords such as “proteomics”, “peptidomics”, “biomarkers”, “chronic kidney disease”, “urine”, “membranous nephropathy” “IgA nephropathy”, “focal segmental glomerulosclerosis” “minimal-change disease”, “diabetic nephropathy”, and “lupus nephritis”. The reference lists of articles were also investigated to explore related literature. The bibliographic information of 1030 retrieved articles was analyzed, and papers with irrelevant or unreliable information, those unavailable in full text, and those not in English were deleted. After deleting all duplicate references, 69 articles remained. A flow chart is outlined in Figure 1.

2. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) 

Several urinary proteome studies have considered the CKD group of pathologies without subdivisions. Harald Mischak’s group is the leader in MS studies on the urinary peptidome and proteome. This group described 1580 native urinary peptides, showing that 73% were unique for urine and proving the clinical value of native urinary peptide markers for diagnosing several diseases, including those associated with kidney damage [14,77,78]. 

Rossing K. et al. developed the first panel consisting of 65 urinary proteins, including collagen fragments, serum albumin, α1-antitrypsin (A1AT), and uromodulin, which differentiated diabetic nephropathy in 97% of cases, showing high sensitivity and specificity among 148 types 2 DM and DN patients [72]. The panel was further successfully validated by Alkhalaf A. et al. [79]. 

Good D.M. et al. analyzed urine samples from 476 patients with CKD (mostly diabetic nephropathy) and 379 controls and developed a classifier based on 273 urinary peptides (CKD273) in the form of a composite CKD biomarker [45]. The panel contained fragments of collagen type I and III α-chains (181 peptides), reflecting the extracellular matrix turnover and reduced protease activity in situ. CKD patients also demonstrated increased urinary excretion of plasma proteins and their fragments (e.g., A1AT, serum albumin, α-hemoglobin chain, and α-fibrinogen chain), kidney-specific proteins (uromodulin, gamma-chain Na+/K+ -ATPase, and membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1), and proteins excreted by the tubules, which may reflect chronic damage to the glomerular filtration barrier, increased glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial fibrosis. In a blinded study, the CKD273 classifier made it possible to differentiate patients with CKD of various etiologies with 85.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity and predict the mortality in type 2 DM with microalbuminuria [45,80,81]. These results were further validated by Schanstra J.P. et al. [18] and Pontillo C. et al. [46], who confirmed this classifier's value as a predictor of renal function deterioration and demonstrated a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min over 5 years of monitoring. Zürbig P. et al. showed that the CKD273 classifier could predict the development of diabetic nephropathy 1.5 years before the onset of microalbuminuria. Argiles A. et al. used the CKD273 classifier on 53 patients with CKD and differentiated patients according to their degrees of impairment of renal function and the risk of end-stage CKD or death [17]. 

Catanese L. et al. developed the FPP_29BH classifier, which contains 29 specific fibrosis biomarkers for patients with various immune and non-immune kidney diseases. The patients with renal fibrosis showed an increase in urinary proteases (cathepsin D, matrix metalloproteinase 2, collagenase 3, and matrix metalloproteinase-14), α-2-HS-glycoprotein, or fetuin-A, as well as 19 different collagen peptide fragments of eight different collagen chains with differential intensities between patients with high and low degrees of fibrosis [47]. 

Since CKD is an umbrella term for several conditions that affect the kidneys, many of the aforementioned markers are not disease-specific. A study of 1180 urine samples by Siwy J. et al. showed that many markers remain the same in different nephropathies and reflect common pathological processes [54]. However, this large-scale study identified a number of specific markers. Three fragments of clusterin were shown to be increased in diabetic nephropathy, β-2-microglobulin was decreased in minimal-change disease, and an S100-A9 protein fragment distinguished lupus nephritis [54]. Other specific proteomic and peptidomics changes in various CKD types, including minimal-change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), membranous nephropathy (MN), IgA nephropathy (IgAN), diabetic nephropathies (DN), and lupus nephritis (LN), are reviewed below. 

Ask for more: david.deng@wecistanche.com  WhatApp:86 13632399501